The regulation of chemical warfare poses a great struggle in times where potential threats not only arise from conflicts between state-actors but also an increasing number of non-state actors. While chemical warfare is already heavily regulated on an international level through agreements such as the Chemical Weapons Convention, a lack of transparency and accusations of state-funded use have shown the need for continued diplomatic efforts on further regulation, to ensure that the detrimental effects of chemical weapons can be limited. Increased military spending and a multitude of global conflicts are two of many hurdles delegates must examine to determine how to balance national sovereignty with the security risk that chemical weapons pose, especially when accountability and non-state actor funding are not often able to be determined.